The EmpLAWyerologist Firm

The Employer's Legal Wellness Professional

  • Home
  • About
    • About Janette Levey Frisch
    • How Can A Employer’s Legal Wellness Professional Help?
  • Our Services
    • Consulting
    • Investigations
    • Training
    • Keynote Speaking
    • Employment Practices Wellness Check-Up
  • Webinars & Seminars
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Schedule Your Free Consultation Today
You are here: Home / Sexual Harassment / Sexual Harassment and Battery Are NOT What the Doctor (Or The Courts) Ordered

Sexual Harassment and Battery Are NOT What the Doctor (Or The Courts) Ordered

February 18, 2021 by theemplawyerologist Leave a Comment

It goes without saying that employers who allow sexual harassment or battery in their workplace are asking for trouble, right? It goes without saying that an employer who ignores complaints of sexual harassment or battery in their workplace is asking for trouble, doesn’t it? Wouldn’t it also go without saying that firing an employee who complains of such conduct is begging to be sued? You would think so.  Apparently, not everyone got that memo. The upside of such spectacular allegations is that they allow the rest of us to learn some valuable lessons, without getting ourselves into hot water. Yes, I do have a specific case in mind. (You knew that though, didn’t you?) Read on and let’s see what we can learn. The case is Madrigal v Montefiore Medical Center. This one apparently has a lot of allegations and the history is a bit convoluted. Here is a very basic version of what went down:

Blanca Madrigal worked as a lab technician at Montefiore Medical Center. Ms. Madrigal alleged years of harassment, a hostile work environment, and battery. Here are just a few of the allegations: She was called  “that fucking Mexican,” “that fucking Spanish,” “the fucking Mexican bitch,” “fucking fat ass” or simply “that bitch, given demeaning assignments, not given to others. A manager “lewdly suggested that she sit on his lap, and that a few days later, while plaintiff was reaching into the breakroom refrigerator, he approached her from behind, wedged himself against her, and rubbed his penis against her backside…” Another supervisor “struck plaintiff with a telephone handset, Ms. Madrigal repeatedly complained about the behavior (mostly from supervisors). Not only did the hospital ignore her complaints, but ultimately it fired her and even admitted it did so because of her “false accusations”.

The years-long campaign of harassment and abuse took its toll on Ms. Madrigal. She began suffering panic attacks, anxiety. Her symptoms included sleeplessness, shortness of breath, necessitating sleep, and anti-anxiety medications. Her termination caused her to slip into depression, from which she apparently still had not recovered, even at the time of trial, years later.

That brings me to the next piece– the lawsuit. (Did anyone not see that coming?) Ms. Madrigal sued, alleging sex discrimination, harassment, hostile work environment, and retaliation under New York State and City Human Rights Laws. She won a total jury verdict of $6 million. Does that sound like justice? Don’t get too excited. The hospital moved for reduction of the damages and a dismissal of her claim for punitive damages, notwithstanding the jury verdict. We’re not done yet, though. The trial judge granted the motion, reducing the total verdict to $523,805, effectively dismissing her battery claim, and dismissed her claim for punitive damages.

Ms. Madrigal appealed. The NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division, 1st Dept reversed. On her claims for battery, emotional distress (hostile work environment), and emotional distress (retaliation) it re-modified to the damages to $2.5m or alternatively granted a new trial. The court also reinstated the punitive damages claim, ordering a new trial.

I’m tempted not to even bother with the takeaways, because, well, should I really even need to state them? Then again, for an employer to have been found by a jury to have behaved so egregiously suggests that, yes, I still do need to spell them out, so here they are (at least the key ones anyway):

  1. Never, ever ignore complaints of harassment, discrimination, battery or any mistreatment of any employee. Do a prompt and thorough investigation;
  2. If the evidence supports the case, take prompt, appropriate disciplinary action–regardless of how high up or popular the perpetrator is;
  3. Don’t take adverse action against anyone who complains of harassment, discrimination or similar mistreatment (or who reports or cooperates in an investigation of such allegations) even if you find no basis for their allegations. Retaliation is a separate claim and you can still end up paying damages on that claim even if you “win” on the underlying claim of harassment/discrimination;
  4. If you do find you need to discipline someone who has recently complained of harassment, discrimination or similar mistreatment, make sure you have solid documentation that the reason is completely independent of their complaint. 

If your organization is the subject of similar allegations and if there is ample supporting evidence, you might think of settling — just saying…

I think that’s enough for now. See you next time…

Watch the latest video clip in my series, “Ask the Employer’s Lawyer: My Employee Has Exhausted All Her FMLA Leave Time. What do I do?

Watch my television interview on Stop My Crisis with Vivian Gaspar.

Contents of this post are for educational/informational purposes only, are not legal advice, and do not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult with competent employment counsel in the state(s) in which you employ people with your specific questions.

Before choosing an attorney, you should give this matter careful thought. The selection of an attorney is an important decision. If you find this communication to be inaccurate or misleading, you may report it to the Committee on Attorney Advertising Hughes Justice Complex, CN 037, Trenton, NJ    

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Sexual Harassment Tagged With: Discrimination, hostile work environment, Madrigal v Montefiore Medical Center, New York City Human Rights Law, New York State Human Rights Law, retaliation, sexual harassment, workplace bullying, workplace harassment, wrongful termination

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tags

ADA ADAAA ADEA Americans with Disabilities Act Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act Civil Rights Act of 1964 co-employment disability discrimination Discrimination DOL EEOC employee leave employment discrimination Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Fair Labor Standards Act Family Medical Leave Act FLSA FMLA FMLA interference FMLA retaliation harassment Independent contractor joint employer joint employment National Labor Relations Act National Labor Relations Board NLRA NLRB overtime Pre-Employment Screening reasonable accommodation reasonable accommodations religious discrimination retaliation sex discrimination sexual harassment sexual orientation discrimination Title VII US Department of Labor US Supreme Court wage and hour worker misclassification workplace harassment workplace safety workplace violence

Join Our Community

Join hundreds of other successful professionals and receive monthly updates and alerts regarding must-read employment law updates as well as invitations to our upcoming webinars.

Connect With The EmpLAWyerologist

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Register for this Webinar

How We Can Help

  • Consulting
  • Training
  • Investigations
  • Keynote Speaking
  • Employment Practices Wellness Check-Up

CONTACT US

Law Office of Janette Levey Frisch
"The EmpLAWyerologist" Firm - The Employer's Legal Wellness Professional
300 Carnegie Center Drive - Ste 150
Princeton, NJ 08540
(732) 902-0728
theemplawyerologist.com

All rights reserved. Copyright The Emplawyerologist Firm. Crafted with by 3P Creative Group.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.