The EmpLAWyerologist Firm

The Employer's Legal Wellness Professional

  • Home
  • About
    • About Janette Levey Frisch
    • How Can A Employer’s Legal Wellness Professional Help?
  • Our Services
    • Consulting
    • Investigations
    • Training
    • Keynote Speaking
    • Employment Practices Wellness Check-Up
  • Webinars & Seminars
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Schedule Your Free Consultation Today
You are here: Home / Americans with Disabilities Act / When Your Employee Can’t Work–But Still Wants the Job Back…

When Your Employee Can’t Work–But Still Wants the Job Back…

February 3, 2021 by theemplawyerologist 1 Comment

Have you ever had an employee that can’t come back to work, but wants their job back, anyway? We hear all the time about employees out on FMLA leave or leave under the ADA are entitled to job protection–but that’s not always so. Yes, there are limits. Even the FMLA and ADA requirements (and similar requirements under many States’ laws) are not absolute. Wait a minute. If an employee isn’t 100% healed, isn’t s/he entitled to reasonable accommodations so s/he can do his/her job? Well, yes, usually, but not always. So when don’t you have to reinstate an employee who’s been out on leave? Read on and see… Yes, you’ve guessed it. I have a real, live case example. (At least it was a real live case up until the court handed down its written decision.) The case is McAllister v. Innovation Ventures LLC dba Living Essential, No. 20-1779 (7th Cir., Dec. 30, 2020). In brief, here’s what went down:

Paula McAllister, a machine operator at Innovation Ventures, was seriously injured in a car accident in June 2016. Innovation Ventures, LLC provided her with medical leave and short-term disability benefits while she received treatment. She had spinal surgery for head and neck injuries as well as a herniated disc, spinal cord compression, central cord syn-drome (which often weakens motor and sensory functioning), a closed-head injury, and a “complex,” “multi-direction laceration.” As I said, she was seriously injured. Her doctors repeatedly stated that she would not be able to return to work in the near future, eventually concluding that she could not return to work until at least February 2017.

Ms. McAllister asked Innovation’s HR Department if she could return to work, before receiving clearance and she was told, “No”. Although she wanted to return to work, she still experienced dizziness, memory loss, dizziness, difficulty “getting words out” and balance issues. HR advised her in October 2016 that her FMLA was expiring, and that per its policy, if she could not return to work after 6 months she would be terminated. Ultimately, Innovation terminated her employment in December 2016. Ms. McAllister applied for and received long-term disability benefits until October 2018, when the insurance carrier determined she no longer had functional deficits that would impede her from working again as a machine operator. (She also applied for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits).

You know what’s coming, right? Ms. McAllister sued Innovation for failure to provide reasonable accommodations under the ADA, among other discrimination allegations. Innovation moved for summary judgment. The US District Court granted the motion and the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.

I guess you don’t need me to tell you that this case was a “win” for the employer (at least if you discount having to hire attorneys and pay them lots and lots of money to get this result). But why did the employer prevail in this case? Title I of the ADA (that’s the chapter dealing with employment issues) protects qualified individuals with disabilities. Certainly, Ms. McAllister was an individual with a disability. What does it mean to be qualified, though? The employee has to be able to perform the essential functions of the job in question, either with or without a reasonable accommodation. The evidence showed that Ms. McAllister could not perform her job’s essential functions even with a reasonable accommodation. As such, she was not qualified to perform her job, and as such, she was not protected under the ADA.

Wait. Isn’t time off a reasonable accommodation under the ADA? Yes, sometimes. If a modest amount of leave would enable an employee to recuperate from a medical condition that is a disability and would enable the employee to return and do his/her job with another reasonable accommodation, then leave is a reasonable accommodation. Here though, it was clear that she would not be able to return to work and perform her job and that there really was no reasonable accommodation that would enable her to do so. The fact that Ms. McAllister applied for and received long-term disability benefits (and that she alleged she was disabled in her applications) more or less supports that conclusion and contradicts her contention that she could return to work. Besides, even the EEOC says that indefinite leave is not a reasonable accommodation.

OK, so what are our takeaways? Here are a few:

  1. You can rely on a doctor’s opinion as to the employee’s ability to perform essential job functions–especially when the employee offers no evidence to the contrary;
  2. This employer had clear policies and communicated clearly with the employee, and did not interfere with her taking leave and getting treatment. In other words, this employer did a lot of things right– and we can all learn from Innovation.
  3. This case appears to have involved a lot of clear, detailed documentation– so document, document, document!

Yes, this employer “won”, but please remember that each case turns on its own specific facts, and you, therefore, must, in EEOC-speak “perform an individualized assessment”. This employee was seriously injured and disabled. Many employees, thankfully, are able to return to work after an accident or illness and would be entitled to reasonable accommodations.

Watch the latest video clip in my series, “Ask the Employer’s Lawyer: My Employee Has Exhausted All Her FMLA Leave Time. What do I do?

Watch my television interview on Stop My Crisis with Vivian Gaspar.

Contents of this post are for educational/informational purposes only, are not legal advice, and do not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult with competent employment counsel in the state(s) in which you employ people with your specific questions.

Before choosing an attorney, you should give this matter careful thought. The selection of an attorney is an important decision. If you find this communication to be inaccurate or misleading, you may report it to the Committee on Attorney Advertising Hughes Justice Complex, CN 037, Trenton, NJ  

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Americans with Disabilities Act Tagged With: ADA, disability discrimination, EEOC, employee leave, FMLA, indefinite leave, job protection, job reinstatement, long-term disability, reasonable accommodation, return to work

Comments

  1. Steve Brown says

    February 3, 2021 at 2:52 pm

    It is nice to see an employer prevail sometimes, especially when it is the “right case”, done the right way.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tags

ADA ADAAA ADEA Americans with Disabilities Act Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act Civil Rights Act of 1964 co-employment disability discrimination Discrimination DOL EEOC employee leave employment discrimination Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Fair Labor Standards Act Family Medical Leave Act FLSA FMLA FMLA interference FMLA retaliation harassment Independent contractor joint employer joint employment National Labor Relations Act National Labor Relations Board NLRA NLRB overtime Pre-Employment Screening reasonable accommodation reasonable accommodations religious discrimination retaliation sex discrimination sexual harassment sexual orientation discrimination Title VII US Department of Labor US Supreme Court wage and hour worker misclassification workplace harassment workplace safety workplace violence

Join Our Community

Join hundreds of other successful professionals and receive monthly updates and alerts regarding must-read employment law updates as well as invitations to our upcoming webinars.

Connect With The EmpLAWyerologist

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Register for this Webinar

How We Can Help

  • Consulting
  • Training
  • Investigations
  • Keynote Speaking
  • Employment Practices Wellness Check-Up

CONTACT US

Law Office of Janette Levey Frisch
"The EmpLAWyerologist" Firm - The Employer's Legal Wellness Professional
300 Carnegie Center Drive - Ste 150
Princeton, NJ 08540
(732) 902-0728
theemplawyerologist.com

All rights reserved. Copyright The Emplawyerologist Firm. Crafted with by 3P Creative Group.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.