The EmpLAWyerologist Firm

The Employer's Legal Wellness Professional

  • Home
  • About
    • About Janette Levey Frisch
    • How Can A Employer’s Legal Wellness Professional Help?
  • Our Services
    • Consulting
    • Investigations
    • Training
    • Keynote Speaking
    • Employment Practices Wellness Check-Up
  • Webinars & Seminars
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Schedule Your Free Consultation Today
You are here: Home / Americans with Disabilities Act / In the Hotseat — For Denying an Employee A Chair…???

In the Hotseat — For Denying an Employee A Chair…???

June 20, 2019 by theemplawyerologist Leave a Comment

Suppose you run a service business with a front desk — a hotel, perhaps. Or you hire cashiers to work at a cash register. You need employees to work at that desk or cash register.  Most of the time the desk clerk or cashier is standing, right? Is it necessary that they stand for the job? In many cases, no. What if your employee asked for a chair and that s/he be allowed to sit? You might not feel strongly enough to argue the point. Or maybe you have a preference, and you feel that since you are the employer and what you say should go.  What if you nicely and politely deny the request. Or maybe, initially you allow the chair but then you change your mind. You then end up in court. Wait. What? The employee could sue you — over a chair? Would a court actually take such a claim seriously? I mean wouldn’t that case be dismissed almost immediately? You might already know where I’m going with this scenario, but yes, you could be sued, and you could lose that case, over a chair. When and how can that happen? The good news is that you can avoid such an outcome. Let’s have a look at the whys, wherefores, and hows, shall we?

Can this really happen? Has it really happened? Yes. The Grand Hyatt Hotel just settled a case with the EEOC on this very issue. (I also posted about a similar case a while back, which you can find here). OK, so here’s what went down: It’s a relatively simple set of facts. An employee worked at the front desk of the Grand Hyatt. The employee had a chronic back impairment that often caused severe pain. Standing for prolonged periods aggravated the back impairment.  The employee requested that he be provided and allowed to sit on a chair. Initially the hotel agreed and provided the chair– for approximately two weeks. The hotel then refused to continue providing the chair or any other accommodation to the employee.

In addition to seeming mean and petty what is wrong with what the Hyatt did? You may already know the answer. The Hyatt’s refusal to provide the chair or an alternate accommodate violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (and the Amendments Act or ADAAA).  Let’s review: the ADA prohibits employers with 15 or more employees from discriminating against qualified individuals with disabilities in hiring or regarding all terms, privileges, benefits and conditions of employment. Failure to provide reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities is discrimination within the meaning of the ADA/ADAAA.

What makes someone qualified? If s/he has the necessary skills, experience, training, etc to perform the essential job functions, or if s/he can perform the essential job functions either with or without a reasonable accommodation, s/he is a qualified individual. The ADA is fairly inclusive in its definition of a disability. Let’s just accept that a chronic back injury is a disability within the meaning of the ADA — because it is. OK, so what’s a reasonable accommodation? Basically a modification to job requirements or work environment or policies that addresses the issue at hand, that is not an undue hardship. well, that just raises another question, right? What’s an undue hardship? When the requested accommodation would pose a significant cost or hardship or significantly burden day to day operation.

Let’s apply these points to the known facts of this case. How hard is it really to provide an employee a chair? How expensive is it? I should also add that the employee proved — and the employer was unable to seriously dispute– that the chair hampered his ability to perform his essential job functions. The settlement requires the employer to pay $85k to the employee, and allow the employee a 6-week leave (presumably to recover from the aggravation to his back impairment), and of course, provide the chair. This of course is all in addition to the money The Grand Hyatt had to pay its attorney(s) to defend the case.

You may not feel that you need me to tell you the takeaways, but I will anyway. Here they are:

  • Take all requests for accommodations of disabilities seriously;
  • If the requested accommodation doesn’t hamper performance of essential job functions and it doesn’t cost you much, grant it;
  • If you believe the request would pose an undue hardship, explore alternatives until you either find one or you properly conclude you cannot. Either provide the alternative or document that you could not do so and why;
  • Document everything!
  • Speak with your friendly employment counsel before you take any adverse actions against employees seeking reasonable accommodations of a disability.

As you can see, the Grand Hyatt apparently did not take the above steps. Well, what can I say, except that turned out to be one very expensive chair! Until the next time…

Contents of this post are for educational/informational purposes only, are not legal advice, and do not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult with competent employment counsel in the state(s) in which you employ people with your specific questions.

Before choosing an attorney, you should give this matter careful thought. The selection of an attorney is an important decision. If you find this communication to be inaccurate or misleading, you may report it to the Committee on Attorney Advertising Hughes Justice Complex, CN 037, Trenton, NJ  

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Americans with Disabilities Act Tagged With: ADA, ADAAA, Americans with Disabilities Act, Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act, EEOC, EEOC v Grand Hyatt, employment law, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, hr, reasonable accommodations, undue hardship

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tags

ADA ADAAA ADEA Americans with Disabilities Act Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act Civil Rights Act of 1964 co-employment disability discrimination Discrimination DOL EEOC employee leave employment discrimination Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Fair Labor Standards Act Family Medical Leave Act FLSA FMLA FMLA interference FMLA retaliation harassment Independent contractor joint employer joint employment National Labor Relations Act National Labor Relations Board NLRA NLRB overtime Pre-Employment Screening reasonable accommodation reasonable accommodations religious discrimination retaliation sex discrimination sexual harassment sexual orientation discrimination Title VII US Department of Labor US Supreme Court wage and hour worker misclassification workplace harassment workplace safety workplace violence

Join Our Community

Join hundreds of other successful professionals and receive monthly updates and alerts regarding must-read employment law updates as well as invitations to our upcoming webinars.

Connect With The EmpLAWyerologist

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Register for this Webinar

How We Can Help

  • Consulting
  • Training
  • Investigations
  • Keynote Speaking
  • Employment Practices Wellness Check-Up

CONTACT US

Law Office of Janette Levey Frisch
"The EmpLAWyerologist" Firm - The Employer's Legal Wellness Professional
300 Carnegie Center Drive - Ste 150
Princeton, NJ 08540
(732) 902-0728
theemplawyerologist.com

All rights reserved. Copyright The Emplawyerologist Firm. Crafted with by 3P Creative Group.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.