The EmpLAWyerologist Firm

The Employer's Legal Wellness Professional

  • Home
  • About
    • About Janette Levey Frisch
    • How Can A Employer’s Legal Wellness Professional Help?
  • Our Services
    • Consulting
    • Investigations
    • Training
    • Keynote Speaking
    • Employment Practices Wellness Check-Up
  • Webinars & Seminars
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Schedule Your Free Consultation Today
You are here: Home / ADEA / The ADEA Protects Applicants — Not Just Employees.

The ADEA Protects Applicants — Not Just Employees.

May 3, 2018 by theemplawyerologist Leave a Comment

By now most of you  know that under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) employers cannot  discriminate against workers aged 40 or older.  You may also know that your company practice, even a seemingly neutral one, is age discrimination if it has a disproportionately negative impact on workers age 40 and over.  I’m guessing you also know that employees have sued — and won– cases on this very basis. But did you also know that the ADEA protects job applicants? ( I have posted on that before. Click here for review.) Beyond that, did you know that your seemingly neutral job posting (or other practices) may put you at risk? The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals just said so, and it’s a safe bet that at least a few other courts will follow suit, so let’s have a look at this issue, shall we?

(image from careerconfidential.com)

 

The case is Kleber v CareFusion. The specific issue: experience caps. Chances are you already have an idea where this discussion is going. Here are the key facts:

Dale Kleber, an experienced attorney, applied to CareFusion for a position as Senior Counsel for Procedural Solutions in 2014. The job posting cited a need for a ‘business person’s lawyer’, who could ‘assume complex projects’. It also said that applicants must have “3 to 7 years of relevant legal experience”. Mr. Kleber’s experience included serving as the CEO of a national dairy trade association, General Counsel of a Fortune 500 company, and Chairman and Interim CEO of a medical device manufacturer.  No one disputes that Mr. Kleber in fact had relevant legal experience. CareFusion did not select Mr. Kleber for an interview. Mr. Kleber was 58 years old when he applied to CareFusion.  Out of 108 applicants, CareFusion interviewed 10, all of whom had no more than 7 years’ experience and ultimately hired a 29-year old candidate.

Kleber filed an EEOC charge. The EEOC issued a “right to sue” letter, and Kleber filed his ADEA lawsuit in December 2014. Kleber alleged that the “3-7 years’ experience” requirement had a disparate impact on older workers. Now, you probably can guess what CareFusion argued.  As an employer, you might be thinking the very same thing. CareFusion said that the cap ensures that they don’t get overqualified employees, who would not stay. Kleber contended that CareFusion’s rationale was based on “unfounded stereotypes”, and that its true intention was to deter applicants over 40 years old from applying.

I do want to digress for just a moment here.  Many have taken exception to the rationale advanced by CareFusion–and many other employers as well. Many have correctly pointed out that younger workers often job hop more than older, even seemingly overqualified workers. In other words, Mr. Kleber has a point– one that employers need to seriously consider.

OK, back to the case. CareFusion, taking a literal and narrow reading of the ADEA moved to dismiss the case, saying that the ADEA only protects employees, not applicants. The US District Court agreed and dismissed the claim and on appeal, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, holding that Congress “clearly” intended the ADEA to apply to applicants, because it makes it unlawful for employers to “fail or refuse to hire..any individual…because of such individual’s age”.  This is where I point out the overly obvious: you can’t fail or refuse to hire an employee. They’re already hired, so yes, that language probably refers to applicants. Who else could it mean?

So now the case goes back to the US District Court and continues along, in accordance with the 7th Circuit ruling. In other words, if the parties don’t settle, then the case can go to trial.

So, what should the rest of us common folk take from this ruling? In a nutshell: stay away from experience caps in your job postings. Minimums are OK. You can say “at least 3 years’ relevant legal experience”. You can describe the types of key functions. If you do receive an application from someone who you suspect is overqualified,  don’t reject the candidate on that basis. Interview the candidate and treat him or her the way you would treat other qualified candidates. In other words, see if s/he is otherwise a good fit for your organization. Don’t assume that s/he is less likely than a younger candidate to stay at the job. If the position is one with limited opportunities for advancement, a younger candidate may be even more likely to leave after getting enough experience to move on to another opportunity.

OK, that’s all I got for now. See you next week!

Contents of this post are for educational/informational purposes only, are not legal advice, and do not create an attorney-client relationship. Consult with competent employment counsel in the state(s) in which you employ people with your specific questions.

Before choosing an attorney, you should give this matter careful thought. The selection of an attorney is an important decision. If you find this communication to be inaccurate or misleading, you may report it to the Committee on Attorney Advertising Hughes Justice Complex, CN 037, Trenton, NJ

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: ADEA Tagged With: ADEA, ADEA and job applicants, age discrimination, age discrimination and job postings, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Discrimination, disparate impact, EEOC, experience cap, job applicants and age, Kleber v CareFusion, workers over 40

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tags

ADA ADAAA ADEA Americans with Disabilities Act Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act Civil Rights Act of 1964 co-employment disability discrimination Discrimination DOL EEOC employee leave employment discrimination Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Fair Labor Standards Act Family Medical Leave Act FLSA FMLA FMLA interference FMLA retaliation harassment Independent contractor joint employer joint employment National Labor Relations Act National Labor Relations Board NLRA NLRB overtime Pre-Employment Screening reasonable accommodation reasonable accommodations religious discrimination retaliation sex discrimination sexual harassment sexual orientation discrimination Title VII US Department of Labor US Supreme Court wage and hour worker misclassification workplace harassment workplace safety workplace violence

Join Our Community

Join hundreds of other successful professionals and receive monthly updates and alerts regarding must-read employment law updates as well as invitations to our upcoming webinars.

Connect With The EmpLAWyerologist

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Register for this Webinar

How We Can Help

  • Consulting
  • Training
  • Investigations
  • Keynote Speaking
  • Employment Practices Wellness Check-Up

CONTACT US

Law Office of Janette Levey Frisch
"The EmpLAWyerologist" Firm - The Employer's Legal Wellness Professional
300 Carnegie Center Drive - Ste 150
Princeton, NJ 08540
(732) 902-0728
theemplawyerologist.com

All rights reserved. Copyright The Emplawyerologist Firm. Crafted with by 3P Creative Group.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.