The EmpLAWyerologist Firm

The Employer's Legal Wellness Professional

  • Home
  • About
    • About Janette Levey Frisch
    • How Can A Employer’s Legal Wellness Professional Help?
  • Our Services
    • Consulting
    • Investigations
    • Training
    • Keynote Speaking
    • Employment Practices Wellness Check-Up
  • Webinars & Seminars
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Schedule Your Free Consultation Today
You are here: Home / Exempt and Nonexempt Employees / Are Your Professionals Sufficiently “Learned” or “Creative” To Be Exempt From Overtime?

Are Your Professionals Sufficiently “Learned” or “Creative” To Be Exempt From Overtime?

January 2, 2014 by theemplawyerologist 18 Comments

Do you employ nurses? Graphics consultants or designers? Did you know that (in addition to other types of employees we have talked about here here and here) these employees may be entitled to overtime, too? What?! Aren’t learned and creative professionals exempt from overtime? The Fair Labor Standards Act  says so! What’s the problem, then? As the employer, you must be able to show that the job functions in question meet the actual requirements of these exemptions. Join The Emplawyerologist after the jump to learn more…

 Professionals usually get a decent,  fixed salary. How can they also be entitled to overtime? The answer depends in part on how you define “professional”. The FLSA recognizes two types of professionals for overtime exemption purposes, the Learned Professional and the Creative Professional.

Here are the criteria for  the Learned Professional  exemption:

  • The employee must be compensated on a salary or fee basis (click here for a review) at a rate not less than $455 per week;
  •  The employee’s primary duty must be the performance of work requiring advanced knowledge, defined as work which is predominantly intellectual in character and which includes work requiring the consistent exercise of discretion and judgment;
  • The advanced knowledge must be in a field of science or learning; and
  • The advanced knowledge must be customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction.

What jobs satisfy these requirements? There are the obvious, such as the doctor or lawyer or accountant.  How about someone who does engineering work but does not have the actual degree or any advanced education or training?  Young v Cooper Cameron Corp 586 F.3d 201 (2d Cir. 2009), relying on DOL regulations, (specifically 29 CFR Sec. 541.308(a) said “No”. Why? The exempt learned professional must have advanced knowledge, “customarily acquired by a  prolonged course of specialized intellectual instruction”. Mr. Young, while he had 20 years of “engineering type experience” was a high school graduate. While he performed “draftsmen, designer and detailer” functions, his job only required a  minimum of 12 years’ relevant experience, and no advanced degree. The DOL regulation specifically says that it is “not the case that just anyone in the field of engineering will qualify for the exemption”. The court said that the employee must be more than just a highly skilled technician. The court cited Mr. Young’s lack of advanced education and training and the fact that his job did not require it, to conclude that Mr. Young, at most, was a highly skilled technician and not a learned professional.

How about a paralegal?  According to the DOL, paralegals generally do not qualify as exempt learned professionals.  The exemption may however be available for paralegals with advanced specialized degrees in other professional fields, who apply that  knowledge  in the performance of their duties. For example, if a law firm hires an engineer as a paralegal to provide expert advice on product liability cases to assist on patent matters, that engineer would qualify for exemption.

Are nurses exempt? The answer is a definite “maybe”!  Registered Nurses registered by a state examining board and paid at least $455 a week on a salary basis are generally considered exempt. If however the same R.N. is paid hourly s/he becomes non-exempt. A Licensed  Practical Nurse, which requires less education and advanced knowledge is not a an exempt learned professional. Hate to sound like broken record, but the title will not determine exempt status. The actual job functions and training/education required will.

Let’s move to one  of my favorite exemption categories, the Creative Professional. To meet this exemption the job functions must meet these criteria:

  • The employee must be compensated on a salary or fee basis (as defined in the regulations) at a rate not less than $455 per week;
  • The employee’s primary duty must be the performance of work requiring invention, imagination, originality or talent in a recognized field of artistic or creative endeavor.

Just how “creative” must the work be? Think of the fellow who came up with the formula for Cool Whip for Kraft Foods. If he was paid the FLSA weekly minimum on a salary basis, he was probably an exempt creative professional.  Let’s look at a few other real-life examples.

Journalists may or may not be exempt creative professionals. Those whose reporting lacks “the sophistication of the national level papers”, whose daily workload prevents them from conducting detailed news analysis  or investigative journalism (which are necessary for this exemption to apply) are not exempt creative professionals, according to Wang v Chinese Daily News, Inc. No. 08-55483 (9th Cir. Sept. 27, 2010). Similarly, reporters at small, community newspapers, who wrote articles about local events using public information and press releases are non-exempt, per the courts in Reich v. Newspapers of New England, Inc 44 F.3d 1060 (1st Cir. 1995), and Reich v. Gateway Press, Inc. 13 F.3d 685, 700 (3rd Cir. 1994). In contrast, a Washington Post reporter whose “job required him to originate his own story ideas, maintain a wide network of sources, write engaging, imaginative prose and produce stories containing thoughtful news analysis of complex issues” is an exempt creative professional. ( See Sherwood v. Washington Post 871 F. Supp.1471, 1482 (D.D.C. 1994). 

Are graphics consultants or designers exempt creative professionals? A litigation graphics consultant whose job was “to convey information about a case in an informative, easily understandable way to triers of fact” was not exempt, according to Kadden v. VisuaLex, LLC, No. 11 Civ 4892, 2012 WL 4354781 (S.D.N.Y.Sept. 24, 2012), because there was no indication that the employee needed to originate stories from scratch or produce complex analyses of or transform any facts given. The key is how much originality and real creativity is generated by the actual person performing the job.

OK, just one more interesting example. How about strippers? What do you think?  While the employer in 4 Exotic Dancers v Spearmint Rhino, et al, No. CV-08-4038 ABC (US. Dist Ct. C.D. CA 2008) argued for the exemption, the strippers felt that their work did not require “invention, imagination, originality or talent in a recognized field of artistic or creative endeavor”. I suspect the strippers are right, but that’s just my humble opinion. Since the court dismissed this case on an unrelated technicality, however, it never actually ruled on this issue.

One more note: If any of the employees described above, were paid $100,000 or more a year (at least $455 a week of which was on a salary basis) and they performed at least one exempt function articulated under the administrative, executive or professional exemption categories they would fall within the Highly Compensated Employee exemption. Remember, an employee can job fail to meet one exemption category but still meet another!

OK,  I did promise to wrap up this topic this week, but I still didn’t cover the exemptions for sales people, so stay tuned and we’ll do that next week — and then we’ll move on to a new topic — for real! Happy 2014 by the way!

Disclaimer: This post’s contents are for informational purposes only, are not legal advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult with competent local employment counsel on any issues discussed here.

Click here to learn more about Janette Levey Frisch, author of The Emplawyerologist.

“Like” The Emplawyerologist on Facebook, by clicking here.

Want to be a guest blogger? Email The Emplawyerologist at theemplawyerologist@gmail.com

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Exempt and Nonexempt Employees, Fair Labor Standards Act, wage and hour Tagged With: Administrative Exemption, Creative Professional, Creative Professional Exemption, Department of Labor, DOL, Emplawyerologist, Executive Exemption, exempt duties, exempt functions, Fair Labor Standard Act, Fair Labor Standards Act, FLSA, FLSA exemptions, Learned Professional Exemption, wage and hour

Comments

  1. m88 says

    January 12, 2015 at 4:56 am

    Excellent pieces. Keep posting such kind of info on your page.
    Im really impressed by it.
    Hello there, You have done a fantastic job. I will definitely digg it and for
    my part suggest to my friends. I’m confident they will be benefited from this site.

    Reply
  2. Tim Seifert says

    April 27, 2016 at 3:38 pm

    Janette, thank you for your information on this topic, it has been one of much thought for me as I am employed as a Landscape Designer. I was hoping to find some more information in this regard because I feel what I do is not similar to a Graphic Designer as my job duties are multi-fold: Designing landscapes is one duties that constitutes about 25% of my job, but I also have to provide customer service to past clients regarding plant warranties, I also do on site project management of construction projects and create estimates for projects. All of this requires more than 40 hours per week to do, and I am not able to sell many landscape projects during the winter in my state.
    Do you have any information, or can you forward me to any information regarding the profession Landscape Designer.

    Reply
    • theemplawyerologist says

      May 26, 2016 at 11:04 am

      Hi Tim,

      From your description it does not sound as though your position meets the criteria for the Creative Professional exemption. First, the presumption is against exemption and in favor of overtime. Second, at best it is unclear whether landscape design falls within this exemption at all. Third, even if a Landscape Designer is a creative professional within the meaning of the exemption, it does not sound as though that is your primary duty, which it would have to be in order for your position to be exempt from overtime. That said, however, you might want to see if your position would fit the criteria for the Administrative Exemption. The main question is how much independent judgment and discretion do you get to exercise in performing your job, and what are your primary duties? Also, as of December 1 the salary threshold is higher. If you are paid a salary and you earn at least $913 a week or $47,436 a year, then you meet the salary test. If you are not paid that much, then even if your job duties meet the Administrative Exemption criteria, you will still not be exempt. You should also check to see if the State in which you are employed has further requirements for either of those exemptions. While it seems likely that you are not exempt, I recommend you speak with someone local to find out more and get an opinion based on all the facts. I hope this has helped a bit. Good luck!

      Reply
  3. My Middle Name is Bob says

    August 18, 2016 at 9:40 am

    So if I am employed as a graphic designer (primary job is to be creative) and make $45,000 a year, could you explain what this means for me and my employer?

    Reply
    • theemplawyerologist says

      August 18, 2016 at 12:19 pm

      Hi, Assuming that the primary job functions of your position meet the exemption criteria, then currently you would be exempt from overtime, but will not be as of December 1, unless your employer raises your salary up to $47,476. Without knowing more specifics about your actual primary job functions, however, I cannot say for sure if you are currently exempt. You may well be. I would encourage you to seek a consultation with local employment counsel to explore further.

      Reply
      • My Middle Name is Bob says

        August 18, 2016 at 2:02 pm

        Thanks for clarifying!

        Reply
        • theemplawyerologist says

          August 18, 2016 at 4:50 pm

          Happy to be of help!

          Reply
  4. Kate Petty says

    October 3, 2016 at 2:53 pm

    I am a church music/choir director. I would like to know if I might be an exception to the new FLSA overtime rule under the creative professional category.

    Reply
    • theemplawyerologist says

      October 5, 2016 at 5:50 pm

      I suspect not. The presumption is against exemptions and in favor of overtime eligibility whenever there is any doubt. There is a level of creativity and inventiveness required (e.g. composition) that I suspect is not present here. I say suspect because I do not have the full job description. If you are concerned you may want to speak with someone local, so that you can also make sure there is no similar or other applicable exemption in your state.

      Reply
  5. Ben Dover says

    April 24, 2017 at 8:55 am

    Have there ever been any cases where current non-exempts successfully reclassified as exempt? My situation is as follows: Held exempt “Assistant Manufacturing Engineer” position from 1996 to 2005, then demoted to non-exempt (same title) after federal rules changes, due to not having an Engineering degree however, employees at a sister plant were “grandfathered” into exempt positions in 2005. I’ve been told over the years that there was no possibility of advancement without a BS however, recently we hired a “non-degreed” professional as an exempt (PLC controls) engineer. Job descriptions are identical for exempt and non-exempts. Exempt employees make considerably more money than the non-exempts so obviously it is in my best interest to seek exemption again. Current salary is >80k with solid performance each year, but our exempts make up to 130k + bonus. I’ve been underpaid for the last 12 years!

    Reply
    • theemplawyerologist says

      April 26, 2017 at 12:08 pm

      Hi Ben,

      Generally for a non-exempt position to be classified as exempt, the primary job functions would have to change enough to warrant the reclassification. A company that has the same job description for exempt and non-exempt positions at a minimum, needs to review the descriptions and review its reasons for classifying some employees in that position as exempt and others as non-exempt. Without knowing more about your primary job functions I cannot say whether your position can properly be classified as exempt. If you have a job description you may want to take it to an employment attorney near you to review it. You of course should also include functions you are performing that are not included in the job description. Depending on the state where you are employed there may be additional criteria for the exemption categories that make it harder to classify the position as exempt under State laws. It could be that you are not otherwise being paid what you are worth, but it may not be an FLSA violation. You might also want to look at who else is performing the same job functions as you and what they are paid and see if there would be any justifications for them being paid more. If there truly are no justifications and you truly are similarly qualified, you may have a pay discrimination claim. Again though you really need to consult with employment counsel in the state where you work to look at your situation and evaluate if you have any legal recourse. Hope this helps. Good luck!

      Reply
  6. Rusty says

    July 6, 2017 at 3:03 pm

    Is there any case law or precedent anywhere that you know of that touches on engineers qualifying for the creative professional exemption? I’m an R&D type, and my company just reclassified me as non-exempt for–I believe–the specific purpose of cutting my sick time (exempt employees get unlimited sick time, non-exempt get the state minimum). This is rather inconvenient for me, since I’m heading into surgery for cancer around the end of this month or the beginning of the next…

    Reply
    • theemplawyerologist says

      July 10, 2017 at 12:06 pm

      I don’t know about creative professional. Assuming your pay is at or above the minimum salary threshold, the answer depends at least in part on whether your primary functions include some type of invention, design or other similar creative activities. It is possible your position meets another exemption category. At the same time, please also keep in mind that if you work in a state that imposes additional requirements for the exemption categories then those will have to be met as well. I suggest you speak with an employment attorney in the state where you work and have a full consultation. Many attorneys will provide a complementary consultation.

      Reply
      • theemplawyerologist says

        July 10, 2017 at 12:07 pm

        Hi,
        If you use a staffing agency and the staffing agency provides workers that work on your premises and you supervise direct and control their work and the work environment, you will likely be a co-employer. So yes, if you switch to another staffing company you will continue to be a co-employer. Hope that helps.

        Reply
      • Rusty says

        March 9, 2018 at 2:41 am

        Sorry, I didn’t get notified of the replies on this.

        Yes: design, invention, and creative processes were certainly involved. I’m an engineer, and was design lead on a project that had already received a patent (with my name on it) for some of the components.

        Things worked out in the end. I was actually terminated shortly after, and in the discovery phase of the lawsuit that followed, my company handed over a stack of emails where the corporate management had explicitly tied my reclassification to my sick time. As soon as those emails saw the light of day, well…

        “The matter has been resolved. I can make no further comment at this time.”

        (Also: I seem to have survived the cancer. So far, at least.)

        Reply
        • theemplawyerologist says

          March 12, 2018 at 4:54 pm

          I am glad to hear that you seem to have survived the cancer and that it seems that the matter with your employer has been resolved. I truly hope that you are headed for better times from here forward.

          Reply
  7. Ramona Hendricks says

    December 4, 2018 at 7:18 pm

    A quick question about the creative classification: I am employed as a content specialist at a communications agency where I create content for social media platforms, digital channels, radio programming, video commercials and scripts. While my supervisor briefs me on the parameters on a given project, I am encouraged to create a wide berth of ideas and concepts, of which I do solo, with a teammate, or in a small group, depending upon the circumstances. Nearly all of my work is based on imagination and is what I consider creative skills. I also help to envision visuals that accompany the copy, which we do in brainstorms. Wouldn’t that qualify me for exemption?Thank you for your thoughts.

    Reply
    • theemplawyerologist says

      December 4, 2018 at 7:40 pm

      Hi Ramona, Based on your description you may fall within the creative professional exemption. Have you been classified as overtime-exempt? Also, depending on what state you work in, there may be additional requirements for you to fall within that category. If there are and your job doesn’t not meet those additional criteria, then even if you would be overtime-exempt under federal law, you might not be due to the additional requirements under state laws. For that reason, I do recommend that employees who have wage and hour questions consult with a local employment attorney.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tags

ADA ADAAA ADEA Americans with Disabilities Act Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act Civil Rights Act of 1964 co-employment disability discrimination Discrimination DOL EEOC employee leave employment discrimination Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Fair Labor Standards Act Family Medical Leave Act FLSA FMLA FMLA interference FMLA retaliation harassment Independent contractor joint employer joint employment National Labor Relations Act National Labor Relations Board NLRA NLRB overtime Pre-Employment Screening reasonable accommodation reasonable accommodations religious discrimination retaliation sex discrimination sexual harassment sexual orientation discrimination Title VII US Department of Labor US Supreme Court wage and hour worker misclassification workplace harassment workplace safety workplace violence

Join Our Community

Join hundreds of other successful professionals and receive monthly updates and alerts regarding must-read employment law updates as well as invitations to our upcoming webinars.

Connect With The EmpLAWyerologist

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Register for this Webinar

How We Can Help

  • Consulting
  • Training
  • Investigations
  • Keynote Speaking
  • Employment Practices Wellness Check-Up

CONTACT US

Law Office of Janette Levey Frisch
"The EmpLAWyerologist" Firm - The Employer's Legal Wellness Professional
300 Carnegie Center Drive - Ste 150
Princeton, NJ 08540
(732) 902-0728
theemplawyerologist.com

All rights reserved. Copyright The Emplawyerologist Firm. Crafted with by 3P Creative Group.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.