The EmpLAWyerologist Firm

The Employer's Legal Wellness Professional

  • Home
  • About
    • About Janette Levey Frisch
    • How Can A Employer’s Legal Wellness Professional Help?
  • Our Services
    • Consulting
    • Investigations
    • Training
    • Keynote Speaking
    • Employment Practices Wellness Check-Up
  • Webinars & Seminars
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Schedule Your Free Consultation Today
You are here: Home / Misclassification of Workers / (The Ghost of?) Misclassified Workers May Be Scarier Than You Think!!!

(The Ghost of?) Misclassified Workers May Be Scarier Than You Think!!!

October 31, 2013 by theemplawyerologist 9 Comments

Today’s post, in keeping with many of you observing Hallowe’en today, covers a scary topic for many businesses. Suppose you own a company and you have many people working for you. Some of them you treat as employees. You had them fill out a W-4 on their date of hire and you are sure to make the proper payroll deductions. You offer health insurance, paid time off, a 401k and the like. Now suppose you recently hired a group of workers that you did not wish to put on your payroll or be subject to all the laws and administrative costs that apply if you are their employer;  maybe those workers did not want to be on record as your full-time employees either. , You therefore call them independent contractors. You send them a 1099 at the appropriate time and you are done — or so you think . You may have misclassified those workers. So what?, you think. If the workers are happy and I’m happy, what’s the problem, who’s hurt? The problem is that you may be in violation of federal and state laws and the penalties can be steep. Let’s start looking into this topic after the jump…

Why do the federal and state governments care how you classify your workers? If a government agency gets involved, you can always assume that the answer, at least in part, will be “money”. Often it will also have to do with protecting people who are or are perceived to be vulnerable to exploitation of some sort , which ends up affecting the state and federal pocketbook–bringing the answer back to “money”. Unlike employee, workers classified as independent contractors do not have access to key benefits, such as minimum wage, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance benefits, family and medical leave and overtime pay, to name a few. The PPACA (aka  “Obamacare”) adds a new layer to this issue. Since the business that utilizes the workers is not ensuring payroll deductions to withhold for taxes, the Treasury, Social Security and Medicare  and state unemployment and workers compensation funds lose money.

Consequently, the federal and most state governments have been stepping up their efforts to crack down on businesses that misclassify their workers.  Specifically, in 2011, Vice President Biden convened a Middle Class Task Force, under whose auspices the US Department of Labor has launched a Misclassification Initiative. Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis announced in September 2011 that the DOL and the IRS signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in which both agencies have agreed to work together and share information in order to reduce occurrences of misclassification, reduce the tax gap and improve compliance with federal labor laws. No business wants to be on either of these agencies’ radar screens–and you certainly do not want to be a target of both at the same time! That’s not all: As of now, the US DOL has MOU’s with at least 14 state Labor Commissioners and is actively pursuing MOU’s with other States. Bottom Line: If you have improperly classified any of your workers as independent contractors, the federal and maybe your state government will likely come after you.

What are the potential penalties for such misclassification? Some of that, of course, will depend on the specific circumstances. Here are just a few: For starters, misclassification can result in back taxes to the IRS of as much as 41.5% of the worker’s wages per year —and that can go back as far as three years. While the extent of the penalty will depend in large part on whether the misclassification was intentional, penalties do exist for unintentional misclassification. For example, the IRS imposes a $50 fine for each W-2 a business should have filed but failed to file on behalf of a worker. Similarly, a business can be subject to a $50.00 fine for each worker for whom it should have obtained a social security number but did not do so. The IRS can also impose penalties of $1000  or up to one year in prison per violation for businesses that fail to withhold the proper amounts from a workers’ wages for taxes. $1000 per violation can start adding up to significant dollars for businesses who have routinely engaged in such a practice over a long period of time. Officers and employees with authority over financial affairs can be held personally liable for up to 100% of the back taxes. These are just IRS penalties! We have not even looked at other agencies, such as DOL who will also get into the act! The US and in some cases State DOLs will go after such businesses for back wages or the value of benefits they determine the worker(s) should have received.  Again, these are not all the scary prospects waiting out there for those who improperly classify their workers.

There are a few misconceptions out there about this issue —and too many businesses are misled by them. Here are some:

  1. We had a signed contract in which the worker agreed that s/he is an independent contractor, so I’m OK, right? No, no, no, no!!!! Wrong answer! Do not pass “Go”. Do not collect $200.00. This is one case where your contract language, is not likely to define your relationship. What determines the worker’s status? The actual working relationship, i.e. how the business and the worker conduct themselves will determine the relationship. Next week’s post will get into the factors considered in determining whether a worker is more likely an employee or independent contractor
  2. It’s the Industry Standard, so I’m OK, right? Don’t get too comfortable here! In order to use the “industry standard” argument, businesses actually have to document how they came to that conclusion and show what evidence they relied upon. If you choose this route, you must show studies, surveys or other informed evidence showing that classifying the workers in question as independent contractors is the standard in your industry.
  3. I can classify workers in a probationary period as Independent Contractors and then, if I am satisfied with their performance, I can make them employees: Here is the problem with that approach. Your actual relationship has not changed and the IRS will now see that you have issued both a 1099 and W-2 for the same employee who did the same work for you and with whom the realities of your relationship did not actually change. Uh oh! You are now at risk of being flagged by the IRS — and other agencies with whom it is now collaborating.
  4. I can classify part-time workers as independent contractors, right? Nope. Sorry. Wrong again. To the extent that part-time workers are doing the same work as your full-time workers, that will not work. I’ll talk more about why in next week’s post.
  5. If the worker runs his or her own independent business s/he is definitely an independent contractor though, right? The answer here is a definite maybe! Why? Again, it will really depend on the realities of how the worker and the business hiring him or her relate to each other and the nature of the work being performed among other factors.
  6. Workers who do not work on my premises do not have to be classified as employees, do they? Yes, they often do. Where they work is not the operative question. What type of work are they doing, and — sorry to sound like a broken record — the realities of how you and they relate to each other determine the worker’s status.

Well, for those of you who get into Hallowe’en, have I scared you enough for today? Can anyone ever be an independent contractor? Yes it is possible. Come back next week and we will discuss the factors to consider in determining when someone is an independent contractor and when they must be classified as an employee. Don’t eat too much candy!

Disclaimer: Contents of this post are for informational purposes only, are not legal advice and do not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult with competent local employment counsel on any issues discussed here.

Click here to learn more about Janette Levey Frisch, author of The Emplawyerologist.

“Like” The Emplawyerologist on Facebook, by clicking here.

Would you like to be a guest blogger? Email The Emplawyerologist at theemplawyerologist@gmail.com

Click here to hear my guest appearance on  Legalocity about the recent US Supreme Court case, Vance  v Ball State University, a case dealing with workplace harassment allegations

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Misclassification of Workers Tagged With: Employee, Hilda Solis, Independent contractor, Internal Revenue Service, IRS, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, United States Department of Labor, US DOL, worker misclassification

Comments

  1. Nate says

    October 31, 2013 at 11:30 am

    “Since the business that utilizes the workers is not ensuring payroll deductions to withhold for taxes, the Treasury, Social Security and Medicare and state unemployment and workers compensation funds lose money.”

    Don’t Manpower, Kelly, Adecco and the other contract labor firms make payroll deductions on these very same workers? If so, what difference does it make which co-employer pays?

    Why wouldn’t workers for firms of the kind mentioned above have access to FMLA, workers comp, unemployment, minimum wage etc through their employer?

    Reply
    • theemplawyerologist says

      October 31, 2013 at 3:17 pm

      Hi Nate,

      Thank you for your question. Your question refers to those situations where a business might decide to hire a staffing agency, who in turn provides the employees on a temporary basis to the business. That is not the situation discussed in this post. In this post, the focus is on a business that hires someone to work for it, and who classifies someone as an independent contractor, when in fact s/he is really an employee. When a staffing agency is involved it is a co-employment situation. (which I will probably discuss in at least one upcoming post). The temporary employee is in fact an employee of both the staffing firm and the client business engaging the staffing firm. More often than not, the staffing firm will fill out the W-2 and ensure proper payroll deductions, but BOTH the staffing firm and the client business are fair game for the IRS, DOL and other government agencies IF the employee is misclassified as an independent contractor. The government does not care what the contract between the staffing firm and the client says. It can go after either or both and then let them fight it out amongst themselves.

      Reply
    • Frank Cania says

      October 31, 2013 at 4:17 pm

      Nate-
      It appears that you may have confused a “contract worker” with an “independent contractor.” As your question implies, a worker provided by a temporary agency would be an employee of the agency, with the protections of the FLSA, unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, etc. In addition, there is likely to be a “co-employer” relationship between the client company and the agency. Therefore, the payroll ensured and the taxes would be paid.

      On the other hand, the services of an “independent contractor” are often contracted for directly with the individual providing the services. Where a true independent contractor relationship exists, the worker does not receive overtime or company benefits, and is not protected by the FLSA, unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, etc. In addition, that worker can often deduct a number of business-related expense items, such as mileage, equipment, supplies, etc. from the money received from the company before a self-employment tax is calculated. The resulting taxes collected for that worker will generally be lower than if he/she were classified as an employee.

      As Janette frighteningly describes in her article, the consequences, even for unintentional misclassification can be severe…including personal liability for management and HR. If a worker is incorrectly classified as an independent contractor, the government may conclude that the worker was “exploited” by the employer in order to avoid paying overtime, benefits, payroll taxes, and so-on. The employer is generally required to make the worker “whole” by paying back wages, overtime, and benefits, as well as liquidated damages. In addition, the employer is often hit with back payroll taxes, fines, penalties, and sometimes legal action.

      Watch out for Goblins tonight!

      Reply
    • theemplawyerologist says

      October 31, 2013 at 5:04 pm

      Well said, Frank! Thank you!

      Reply
  2. google api key says

    March 22, 2014 at 4:21 am

    Have you ever thought about including a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is important and all. Nevertheless
    imagine if you added some great photos or video clips to give
    your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and videos,
    this site could undeniably be one of the greatest in its niche.
    Wonderful blog!

    Reply
    • theemplawyerologist says

      April 9, 2014 at 9:59 pm

      Thanks for your feedback! I did have some clips in some earlier posts and have included some in my last few posts as well.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tags

ADA ADAAA ADEA Americans with Disabilities Act Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act Civil Rights Act of 1964 co-employment disability discrimination Discrimination DOL EEOC employee leave employment discrimination Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Fair Labor Standards Act Family Medical Leave Act FLSA FMLA FMLA interference FMLA retaliation harassment Independent contractor joint employer joint employment National Labor Relations Act National Labor Relations Board NLRA NLRB overtime Pre-Employment Screening reasonable accommodation reasonable accommodations religious discrimination retaliation sex discrimination sexual harassment sexual orientation discrimination Title VII US Department of Labor US Supreme Court wage and hour worker misclassification workplace harassment workplace safety workplace violence

Join Our Community

Join hundreds of other successful professionals and receive monthly updates and alerts regarding must-read employment law updates as well as invitations to our upcoming webinars.

Connect With The EmpLAWyerologist

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Register for this Webinar

How We Can Help

  • Consulting
  • Training
  • Investigations
  • Keynote Speaking
  • Employment Practices Wellness Check-Up

CONTACT US

Law Office of Janette Levey Frisch
"The EmpLAWyerologist" Firm - The Employer's Legal Wellness Professional
300 Carnegie Center Drive - Ste 150
Princeton, NJ 08540
(732) 902-0728
theemplawyerologist.com

All rights reserved. Copyright The Emplawyerologist Firm. Crafted with by 3P Creative Group.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.